🔗 Share this article EU Could Respond to ‘Unjustified’ US Travel Restrictions, Official States The European Union might “act quickly and firmly” against what it calls “unwarranted” travel bans imposed by the United States against five European individuals involved in fighting online hate and disinformation, a European Commission spokesperson stated. EU Officials Decry US Action as ‘Intimidation’ European leaders including the French president accused Washington of “coercion and intimidation”, following the visa restrictions were placed on individuals that were central to efforts to introduce laws governing US-based technology firms. “For too long, ideologues in Europe have led coordinated campaigns to coerce US companies to punish US perspectives they oppose,” stated the US secretary of state online. “The current administration will no longer tolerate these egregious acts of censorship beyond its borders.” Broad Criticism From EU Nations Nations including Germany, Spain, and the UK, alongside numerous EU representatives supported the French president in condemning the move. The bans were enacted this week on a former EU commissioner involved in crafting the bloc’s digital governance law, along with several anti-disinformation campaigners, from two in Germany and two in the UK. A Deepening Dispute Over Regulation This European legislation is seen by Washington as a type of speech restriction, while European leaders argue the rules are necessary to combat hate speech and disinformation. This disagreement threatens to become a facet of a far wider ongoing political and ideological clash between the current US administration and European institutions. Additional Updates Reported Today In related judicial news: A federal judge has halted efforts to reduce federal homeland security funding to states which resist specific federal immigration rules. The official ruled the case was “another example” of tying government assistance to policy compliance. Authorization was issued for the dispatch of 350 national guard members to New Orleans prior to the holiday period, coinciding with an ongoing border security initiative. The nation of Palau will consent to accept a limited number of migrants from the US in exchange for additional aid, following concluding a formal agreement with US authorities. Additionally, a Democratic lawmaker has initiated legal action seeking the removal of a political figure’s name from a prominent cultural institution in Washington DC. Analysts point out that comments regarding foreign petroleum resources reflect a wider ideology in some quarters of “resource imperialism”, leading to parallels with historical international actions.
The European Union might “act quickly and firmly” against what it calls “unwarranted” travel bans imposed by the United States against five European individuals involved in fighting online hate and disinformation, a European Commission spokesperson stated. EU Officials Decry US Action as ‘Intimidation’ European leaders including the French president accused Washington of “coercion and intimidation”, following the visa restrictions were placed on individuals that were central to efforts to introduce laws governing US-based technology firms. “For too long, ideologues in Europe have led coordinated campaigns to coerce US companies to punish US perspectives they oppose,” stated the US secretary of state online. “The current administration will no longer tolerate these egregious acts of censorship beyond its borders.” Broad Criticism From EU Nations Nations including Germany, Spain, and the UK, alongside numerous EU representatives supported the French president in condemning the move. The bans were enacted this week on a former EU commissioner involved in crafting the bloc’s digital governance law, along with several anti-disinformation campaigners, from two in Germany and two in the UK. A Deepening Dispute Over Regulation This European legislation is seen by Washington as a type of speech restriction, while European leaders argue the rules are necessary to combat hate speech and disinformation. This disagreement threatens to become a facet of a far wider ongoing political and ideological clash between the current US administration and European institutions. Additional Updates Reported Today In related judicial news: A federal judge has halted efforts to reduce federal homeland security funding to states which resist specific federal immigration rules. The official ruled the case was “another example” of tying government assistance to policy compliance. Authorization was issued for the dispatch of 350 national guard members to New Orleans prior to the holiday period, coinciding with an ongoing border security initiative. The nation of Palau will consent to accept a limited number of migrants from the US in exchange for additional aid, following concluding a formal agreement with US authorities. Additionally, a Democratic lawmaker has initiated legal action seeking the removal of a political figure’s name from a prominent cultural institution in Washington DC. Analysts point out that comments regarding foreign petroleum resources reflect a wider ideology in some quarters of “resource imperialism”, leading to parallels with historical international actions.